
Bitnami redmine service unavailable software#
Of course web-based hosted software has similar issues in regards to different browsers and different versions of those browsers, but this issue is the same for web-based installed software.
Bitnami redmine service unavailable upgrade#
If your latest version is 3.2, and a few thousand people are still running 3.0 instead of 3.1, what does that mean for your upgrade procedure? And what about those people still on 2.9 or 2.8.7? Maintaining backward compatibility is probably the biggest impediment to software progress. Backward compatibility headachesįurther, when you sell installable software you have to deal with backward compatibility. This is even more complicated with remote server installs when there may be different versions of Ruby, Rails, MYSQL, etc. When something goes wrong it’s a lot harder to figure out why if you aren’t in control of the OS or the third party software or hardware that may be interfering with the install, upgrade, or general performance of your product. With desktop or remote server based software you may have a single code base (as long as you haven’t made custom versions for this, that, and the other customer), but you have to deal with endless operating environment variations that are out of your control. Installable = Lots of room for things to go wrong The significance of this can not be overstated. We’re in charge of putting together the optimal software and hardware set-up to run our products. With web-based software we have a single code base optimized for a single operating environment.

Software is hard enough to get right when you control the variables. Hosted = Controlled development and deployment environment For some companies this wouldn’t be a big deal, but for us it would be a real drag. If we built installable software we’d have to spend a lot more of our time on technical support, write a lot more documentation, slow down our development process, and lose a fair bit of control over our customer experience.

We probably couldn’t be as small, we certainly wouldn’t be as agile, and we definitely wouldn’t be as happy. Here’s why: We would have to be a fundamentally different company to develop, sell, and distribute installable software. This question is actually more about business than it is about software. It would be highly unlikely that we’d sell installable software. Do you have any plans on ever releasing your applications for purchase to be run internally at a company?
